Clendenin

(PC) Hester v. Clendenin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20221:20-cv-01569California362 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM HESTER, No. 1:20-cv-01569-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

STEPHANIE CLENDENIN, et al., (Doc. No. 27) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff William Hester is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to the California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. are considered civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 7, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that defendant Clendenin’s motion to dismiss be granted and that this action be dismissed, with prejudice, as time barred. (Doc. No. 27.) Those…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.