Edge-Works Manufacturing Company v. Concealed Carrier, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDGE-WORKS MANUFACTURING No. 2:22-cv-1432 DB
COMPANY.,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 CONCEALED CARRIER, LLC d/b/a TACTICON ARMAMENT, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff, proceeding through counsel, commenced this action on August 12, 2022, by filing a complaint and paying the required filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to the Local Rules, Appendix A(m). On August 15, 2022, plaintiff filed a notice of request to seal. (ECF No. 8.) Local Rule 141(b) requires, in relevant part, that a “‘Request to Seal Documents’ shall set forth the statutory or other authority for sealing, the requested duration, the identity, by name or category, of persons permitted access to the documents, and all other relevant information.” In evaluating requests to seal, the court starts “‘with a strong presumption in favor of access to court records.’” Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th Cir. 2016) 27 …