Navarro

(PC) Dixon v. Navarro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20222:19-cv-01966California1,132 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DELMAR JEWELL DIXON, JR., Case No. 2:19-cv-01966-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

v. DISMISS BE GRANTED DANIEL NAVARRO, ECF No. 44 Defendant. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY AND TO

DISMISS DEFENDANT’S REPLY ECF Nos. 43 & 46 17 18 Plaintiff Delmar Jewell Dixon, Jr. is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that defendant Daniel Navarro violated his due process rights by reporting that plaintiff was conspiring to distribute a controlled substance in Mule Creek State Prison. Defendant Navarro has moved to dismiss this claim, ECF No. 44, and his motion should, for the reasons stated hereafter, be granted. Plaintiff, for his part, has moved both for early discovery, ECF No. 43, and to dismiss defendant’s reply to his opposition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.