Minna

Minna v. Rowley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20222:21-cv-01329California2,110 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAMIEN MINNA, No. 2:21-cv-01329-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER LONDA RAE ROWLEY, et al., Defendants.

17 Defendants move for an order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36(a)(6) deeming matters admitted. (ECF No. 25.) After careful review of the parties’ joint statement addressing the discovery dispute (ECF No. 27), the undersigned finds oral argument to be unnecessary. Accordingly, the hearing scheduled for August 31, 2022 will be vacated. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will grant in part and deny in part the motion to deem matters admitted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Damien Minna filed this action under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) on July 29, 2021. The first amended complaint was filed on December 30, 2021. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff alleges defendants Londa Rowley and Marc Rowley failed to provide plaintiff a wheelchair accessible guestroom in conformance with ADA standards…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.