CDCR

(HC) Chatten-Barkley v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20221:21-cv-01714California1,053 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MELISSA CHATTEN-BARKLEY, Case No. 1:21-cv-01714-SAB-HC

Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

GRANT RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO

v. DISMISS AND DISMISS PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CDCR,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

Respondent. TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT

JUDGE

16 (ECF No. 6) 17 Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. I. BACKGROUND In the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus, Petitioner challenges the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s failure to allow her to file a request under California Penal Code section 13891 to resolve her out-of-state detainer. (ECF No. 1.)

25 1 The Interstate Agreement on Detainers (“IAD”), codified by California Penal Code section 1389, is “an agreement between California, 47 other states, and the federal government. It facilitates the resolution of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.