Imber

Imber v. Lackey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20221:22-cv-00004California520 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON IMBER, Case No. 1:22-cv-00004-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO FILE SURREPLY

v. (Doc. No. 64) BRUCE LACKEY; PAM LACKEY;

LACKEY FAMILY TRUST; COLE

SCHARTON; THE ADMINISTRATIVE

COMMITTEE OF THE PEOPLE

BUSINESS EMPLOYEE STOCK

OWNERSHIP PLAN; MIGUEL

PAREDES; RICH ROUSH; DEL

THACKER; RICHARD DEYOUNG;

RITCHIE TRUCKING SERVICE

HOLDINGS, INC.; PEOPLE BUSINESS

EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP

PLAN;

20 Defendants. 21 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Brandon Imber’s motion for leave to file a surreply filed on May 16, 2022. (Doc. No. 64). Imber seeks leave to file a surreply to address new arguments Roush, Thacker, and DeYoung raised for the first time in their reply concerning who served as members of the board of directors of Ritchie Trucking Service Holdings, Inc. and to address the arguments that Plaintiff had “actual knowledge ‘who were the directors before and during the 2018 Transaction and who joined…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.