Imber
Imber v. Lackey
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20221:22-cv-00004California520 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON IMBER, Case No. 1:22-cv-00004-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO FILE SURREPLY
v. (Doc. No. 64) BRUCE LACKEY; PAM LACKEY;
LACKEY FAMILY TRUST; COLE
SCHARTON; THE ADMINISTRATIVE
COMMITTEE OF THE PEOPLE
BUSINESS EMPLOYEE STOCK
OWNERSHIP PLAN; MIGUEL
PAREDES; RICH ROUSH; DEL
THACKER; RICHARD DEYOUNG;
RITCHIE TRUCKING SERVICE
HOLDINGS, INC.; PEOPLE BUSINESS
EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP
PLAN;
20 Defendants. 21 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Brandon Imber’s motion for leave to file a surreply filed on May 16, 2022. (Doc. No. 64). Imber seeks leave to file a surreply to address new arguments Roush, Thacker, and DeYoung raised for the first time in their reply concerning who served as members of the board of directors of Ritchie Trucking Service Holdings, Inc. and to address the arguments that Plaintiff had “actual knowledge ‘who were the directors before and during the 2018 Transaction and who joined…