Gonzalez

(PC) Ruiz v. Gonzalez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20222:22-cv-01133California438 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL RUIZ, Case No. 2:22-cv-01133-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PAY THE FILING FEE,

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, AND FAILURE

ELIZABETH GONZALEZ, et al., TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS Defendant. RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

DAYS

17 On July 12, 2022, I ordered plaintiff to submit, within thirty days, either the $402 filing fee or an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 3. To date, plaintiff has not complied with that order. To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissal of a case, for failure to comply with court orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.