Corpuz
(PC) Fairfield v. Corpuz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELISSA FAIRFIELD, Case No. 1:19-cv-00632-DAD-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO APPOINT COUNSEL
v.
ORDER GRANTING CONSTRUED MOTION
A. KHOO, I. SINGH, FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 95, 96) 16 Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel and motion seeking a thirty-day extension of time to obtain counsel filed on July 1, 2022. (Doc. Nos. 95, 96). Defendants did not file a response to either motion. Their non-response will be deemed no opposition under Local Rule 230(c)(E.D. Cal. 2022). For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel without prejudice. The Court, however, will re- evaluate appointment of counsel for Plaintiff should this case proceed to trial. The Court grants in part Plaintiff’s motion for a thirty-day extension of time to the extent set forth herein. In requesting appointment of counsel, Plaintiff…