Corpuz

(PC) Fairfield v. Corpuz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20221:19-cv-00632California630 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELISSA FAIRFIELD, Case No. 1:19-cv-00632-DAD-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO APPOINT COUNSEL

v.

ORDER GRANTING CONSTRUED MOTION

A. KHOO, I. SINGH, FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 95, 96) 16 Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel and motion seeking a thirty-day extension of time to obtain counsel filed on July 1, 2022. (Doc. Nos. 95, 96). Defendants did not file a response to either motion. Their non-response will be deemed no opposition under Local Rule 230(c)(E.D. Cal. 2022). For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel without prejudice. The Court, however, will re- evaluate appointment of counsel for Plaintiff should this case proceed to trial. The Court grants in part Plaintiff’s motion for a thirty-day extension of time to the extent set forth herein. In requesting appointment of counsel, Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.