(SS) Hurst v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SANDRALEE HURST, Case No. 1:22-cv-00235-BAK(HBK) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ JOINT
MOTION TO REMAND UNDER SENTENCE
v. FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REVERSING
FINAL DECISION AND REMANDING
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL CASE1
SECURITY,
(Doc. No. 13) Defendant. ORDER FINDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOOT
(Doc. No. 10) 19 20 Pending before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Remand filed August 22, 2022. (Doc. No. 13). Plaintiff and the Commissioner of Social Security agree that this case should be remanded for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Id.). The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in conjunction with a judgment either affirming, reversing, or modifying the Secretary’s decision. See Melkonyan v.…