(HC)Castaneda

(HC)Castaneda v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20221:20-cv-00377California10,236 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISAAC SCOTT CASTANEDA, Case No. 1:20-cv-00377-JLT-HBK (HC) Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO

v. DISMISS PETITION AS UNTIMELY1 THERESA CISNEROS, FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD Respondent. (Doc. No. 24) 16 17 Petitioner Isaac Scott Castaneda (“Petitioner” or “Castaneda”), a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1, “Petition”). In response, Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. No. 24). Petitioner filed an opposition to the Motion to Dismiss and supplemental briefing after being directed by the Court. (Doc. Nos. 18, 27, 29). Petitioner did not file a response to Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss or the supplemental briefing, and the time for doing so has expired. For the reasons set forth more fully below, the undersigned recommends granting Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss. 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.