CDCR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERNANDO SAMANIEGO, No. 2:19-cv-2606 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION

AND REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER

CDCR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner, proceeding through counsel. The parties filed a joint stipulation for plaintiff to file a second amended complaint and a joint motion to modify the scheduling order. As set forth below, the joint stipulation is approved, and the requests to file the amended complaint and modify the scheduling order are granted. Governing Standards “The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Rule 16(b) provides that “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). “The schedule may be modified ‘if it cannot…