Bravdrick

(PC) Correa v. Bravdrick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20221:19-cv-00369California1,270 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANGELO CORREA, No. 1:19-cv-00369-ADA-BAK (GSA) (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO COMPEL

v. (Doc. 87) BRAUDRICK, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Angelo Correa is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On August 15, 2022, Plaintiff filed a “Motion for an Order Compelling Discovery.” (Doc. 87.) Plaintiff contends Defendants Braudrick, Maddux and Salinas should be compelled to “answer fully” certain interrogatories directed to each. (Id. at 2.) Further, Plaintiff contends those same Defendants, as well as C. Scott, the Litigation Coordinator at Wasco State Prison, should be compelled to produce certain documents requested of them as Plaintiff has not yet received them. (Id. at 3-4.) Plaintiff also requests the Court order Defendants to pay the sum of $2,000 to Plaintiff “as reasonable expenses in obtaining this order, on the ground…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.