S.G.P.

S.G.P. v. Tehachapi Unified School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20221:22-cv-01066California809 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 S.G.P., Case No. 1:22-cv-01066-ADA-BAK 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPOINT CLARISSA PARKS AS v. GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR S.G.P.

TEHACHAPI UNIFIED SCHOOL ORDER VACATING OCTOBER 4, 2022

DISTRICT, HEARING

Defendant. (ECF No. 6)

16 On August 22, 2022, Plaintiff instituted this action by filing a petition for a minor’s compromise of “claims arising under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Section 504”), and any other known or unknown claims arising out of Plaintiff’s educational program.” (ECF No. 1 at 2.) On August 24, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion for the appointment of Clarissa Parks as guardian ad litem. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff set the matter for hearing for October 4, 2022, before District Judge Dale A. Drozd in Courtroom 5. (Id.) On August 24, 2022, this 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.