Corpuz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELISSA FAIRFIELD, Case No. 1:19-cv-00632-DAD-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO DEPOSE DEFENDANTS

v.

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

A. KHOO, I. SINGH, FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

Defendants. ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S DOCUMENT

REQUESTS (Doc. No. 97) 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s pleading titled “Motion to Set Up Deposition for Defendants and Request for Production of Documents” filed on July 11, 2022. (Doc. No. 97). Defendants did not respond to the motion and the time to do so has expired so the motion is deemed unopposed. See Local Rule 230(c). Plaintiff proceeds in this § 1983 action pro se and in forma pauperis. (See docket). Pointing to Rule 37(b)(1), Plaintiff notes depositions may be done by remote means and the parties may stipulate to conduct depositions but states…