Loterzstain

(PC) Newsome v. Loterzstain

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20222:19-cv-00307California4,721 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHELDON RAY NEWSOME, Case No. 2:19-cv-00307-DAD-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO

APPOINT COUNSEL AND TO BE PRESENT

v. AT PRELIMINARY PROCEEDING BE

DENIED

LOTERZSTAIN, et al., ECF Nos. 75 & 78 Defendants.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE

GRANTED AND THAT PLAINTIFF’S

MOTIONS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF BE

DENIED ECF Nos. 61, 65, & 70 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN 14 DAYS 21 22 Plaintiff Sheldon Newsome, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleges that defendants Loterzstain and Dirisu violated his First and Eighth Amendment rights by retaliating against him and denying him adequate medical care.1 26 1 The parties’ filings are inconsistent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.