Crocker

Crocker v. City of South Lake Tahoe

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20222:22-cv-01099California497 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

|}poRTER SCOTT |] A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Carl L. Fessenden, SBN 161494 3 || Matthew W. Gross, SBN 324007 350 University Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481

FAX: 916.927.3706

6 || cfessenden@porterscott.com mgross@porterscott.com Attorneys for Defendant g CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 BENJAMIN CROCKER, Case No.: 2:22-cv-01099-JAM-AC 13 Plaintiff, STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO STAY CIVIL ACTION PENDING RESOLUTION OF vs. CRIMINAL MATTER; ORDER

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, ZACHARY

16 || WIENS, JASON NIXON, JONATHAN FAC Filed: 7/9/22 TODEREAN and DOES 1-50, inclusive, M Defendants 18 19 20 Plaintiff Benjamin Crocker (‘Plaintiff’) 1s a defendant in a criminal proceeding in the Superior Cot of California, County of El Dorado, Case Number 22-CR-0245, that arise from the same facts □□□□□□□□□ Plaintiff's Complaint in this civil action. When a plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.