Manning
Manning v. Jayco, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TONY MANNING, an individual, No. 2:21-cv-01387-MCE-CKD Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAYCO, INC., a California Corporation;
FREIGHTLINER CUSTOM CHASSIS
CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Tony Manning (“Plaintiff”) instituted the present action, citing extensive and ongoing problems with a recreational vehicle (“RV”) manufactured by Defendants Jayco, Inc. (“Jayco”) and the Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation (“Freightliner”) since purchasing the vehicle in 2020. Federal jurisdiction is predicated on alleged violations of express and implied warranties under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 2301, et seq. Presently before the Court is Jayco’s Motion to Transfer Venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). ECF No. 14. As set forth below, that Motion is GRANTED.2 26 1 Defendant Freightliner is not a party to Jayco’s Motion.
2 Having determined that oral argument would…