Santoro

(PC) Smith v. Santoro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20221:21-cv-01329California3,029 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY J. SMITH, Case No. 1:21-cv-01329-JLT-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

v. RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

K. SANTORO, et al., COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Defendants. (ECF No. 28)

17 Plaintiff Anthony J. Smith is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. BACKGROUND On June 1, 2022, Findings and Recommendations were issued to dismiss the instant action for failure to state a claim, failure to comply with a court order, and failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 21.) No objections were filed and the time to do so passed. On July 11, 2022, the Findings and Recommendations in full, and the case was dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief, failure to comply with a court order, and failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 24.) Judgment was entered the same day. /// On the same…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.