Lewis

(UD)(PS) Hartono v. Lewis

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20222:22-cv-01151California413 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Agus Hartono, No. 2:22-cev-01151-KJM-DB Plaintiff, ORDER v. Yolanda Lewis, 1S Defendant. 16 Pro se defendant Yolanda Lewis moves this court to reconsider its order remanding this unlawful detainer action to state court and to stay this case pending appeal. See Mot. Recons., ECF No. 6; Mot. Stay, ECF No. 8. Ms. Lewis moved for reconsideration the day after this court 20 issued its order, so Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) applies. See Fed R. Civ. P. 59(e) (“A motion to alter or amend a judgment must be filed no later than 28 days after the entry of the judgment.”). A Rule 59(e) motion “should not be granted, absent highly unusual circumstances, 23 unless the district court is presented with newly discovered evidence, committed clear error, or if 24 there is an intervening change in the controlling law.” 389 Orange Street Partners v. Arnold, 179 F.3d 656, 665 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.