Leckie

(PC) Hulbert v. Leckie

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20222:22-cv-00082California3,392 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARREN SCOTT HULBERT, No. 2:22-cv-0082 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

F. LECKIE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 2, 6. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Also before this court are plaintiff’s two motions for temporary restraining orders (“TROs”) and two requests for hearings on the motions. ECF Nos. 3, 9-11. For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted, and he will be directed to file a first amended complaint. In addition, it will be recommended that plaintiff’s motions for temporary restraining orders (“TRO”) and his requests for hearings on them be denied. I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.