Pfeiffer

(PC) Smith v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20221:19-cv-00437California424 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARMAAL SMITH, Case No. 1:19-cv-0437 JLT HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v., THE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Doc. 25) CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, et al.,

Defendants.

The assigned magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s complaint as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. (Doc. 24.) The magistrate judge noted Plaintiff alleged 19 causes of action against 27 named defendants and 5 “John Doe” defendants. (Id. at 2.) The magistrate judge reviewed the allegations of the pleading and found Plaintiff failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. (Id. at 4-11.) The Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint; notify the Court that he wished to stand on his current complaint, which was subject to dismissal; or file a notice of voluntary dismissal. (Id. at 11-12.) The Court provided Plaintiff 30 days to respond to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.