Shute

(PC) Jones v. Shute

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20222:22-cv-01384California2,604 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCELL JONES, No. 2:22-cv-1384 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MICHELLE SHUTE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court are plaintiff’s complaint for screening and plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons set forth below, this court grants plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and finds plaintiff states no cognizable claims for relief. The complaint will be dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff will be assessed an initial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.