Castro

(PC) Williams v. Castro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20221:20-cv-01617California4,511 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT CURTIS WILLIAMS, III Case No. 1:20-cv-01617-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff, TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

v. Telephonic Pretrial Hearing: January 20, 2023, at 9:30 a.m. CASTRO, et al.,

Defendants. Telephonic Motions in Limine Hearing: February 8, 2023, at 10:00 a.m.

Jury Trial: February 21, 2023, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9 (SAB); 2-3 Days

19 Plaintiff Robert Curtis Williams, III is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 20 civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. All parties consented to Magistrate Judge 21 jurisdiction. (ECF No. 38.) 22 This action is proceeding against Defendants Regado and Castro for deliberate 23 indifference to Plaintiff’s safety and violation of the Equal Protection Clause. 24 On August 26, 2022, Defendants filed a notice of intent to not file a dispositive motion. 25 Accordingly, this case is no ready to proceed to jury trial. This matter is set for a telephonic 26 pretrial hearing on January 20, 2023, at 9:30…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.