(PS) Sanders v. Sacramento Sheriff's Department

Caution
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20222:22-cv-01232California2,465 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SASSUS SANDERS, No. 2:22-cv-01232-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER

SACRAMENTO SHERIFF’S

DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff’s proceeds without counsel and seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 Plaintiff’s complaint filed on July 13, 2022 (ECF No. 1) is before the court for screening. Plaintiff has also filed an application in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis. The application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) Accordingly, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. For the reasons set forth below, the allegations of the complaint, as currently pleaded, fail to state a cognizable claim. Plaintiff will have an opportunity to file an amended complaint. In any amended complaint, plaintiff shall allege in specific terms how each named defendant is involved in the alleged violations. 27 1 This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.