Firat

Firat v. January Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20221:22-cv-00993California160 words

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MANDY FIRAT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00993-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

CLOSE CASE IN LIGHT OF PLAINTIFF’S

JANUARY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., VOLUNTARY NOTICE OF DISMISSAL Defendant. (ECF No. 7) 15 16 On August 29, 2022, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 7), with 18 prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)G), as Defendant has not filed an answer or motion for summary judgment. Therefore, this action has been terminated with 20 prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)G); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. || 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. 22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23 Dated: _ August 30, 2022 [Jee Fey —

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26 27 28