Acosta

De Los Santos v. Acosta

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20221:21-cv-00397California192 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 9 CHRISTINE DE LOS SANTOS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00397-JLT-BAK (SAB) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE

v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) OFFICER ACOSTA, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE

Defendants. (ECF No. 23) 14 On August 31, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal. (ECF No. 23.) In light 16 of the notice of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i1); Wilson 17 v.City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice, 18 with each party to bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust 20 the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FA. 3 Dated: _September 1, 2022 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.