Schaupp

Schaupp v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20221:22-cv-00849California1,369 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAROLYN SCHAUPP, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-0849-JLT-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY

v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS,

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al, REQUIRE PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE

FILING FEE AND DENY MINOR

Defendants. PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATIONS TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Docs. 10, 11) 17 Carolyn Schaupp, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint in this action on behalf of herself and minors L.S., D.S., P.I., and J.B. on July 11, 2022. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2.) Concurrently with the complaint and IFP application, Plaintiff filed a motion to appoint counsel and motion for permission for electronic case filing (both of which remain pending until the IFP matter has been resolved (Docs. 3, 4)), and a motion for temporary restraining…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.