Schaupp
Schaupp v. County of Stanislaus
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20221:22-cv-00849California1,369 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAROLYN SCHAUPP, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-0849-JLT-SAB
Plaintiffs, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY
v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS,
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al, REQUIRE PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE
FILING FEE AND DENY MINOR
Defendants. PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATIONS TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Docs. 10, 11) 17 Carolyn Schaupp, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint in this action on behalf of herself and minors L.S., D.S., P.I., and J.B. on July 11, 2022. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2.) Concurrently with the complaint and IFP application, Plaintiff filed a motion to appoint counsel and motion for permission for electronic case filing (both of which remain pending until the IFP matter has been resolved (Docs. 3, 4)), and a motion for temporary restraining…