Lozano

(PC) Johnson v. Lozano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20222:19-cv-01128California545 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTOINE L. JOHNSON, No. 2:19-cv-1128 MCE DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JARED LOZANO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner who was proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 19, 2019, filed a complaint alleging defendants violated his rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. (ECF No. 1.) Upon screening, the court found plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim for relief under § 1983, gave plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint, granted plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and ordered the prison to collect payments from plaintiff’s trust account. (ECF Nos. 10, 11.) Plaintiff was given the opportunity to file an amended complaint and did so on October 28, 2020. (ECF No. 15.) The court screened this First Amended Complaint and found service appropriate. (ECF No. 20.) Following the issuance of summons to defendants,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.