Gettings
Gettings v. Kacalek
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JIMMY GETTINGS, No. 2:21-cv-1139 DAD DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SHASTA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Jimmy Gettings is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned are defendants’ amended motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as well as plaintiff’s request for “ruling to be placed on hold,” and to appear telephonically at a hearing. (ECF Nos. 10, 13, & 14.) For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted, plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint, and plaintiff’s motions are denied as having been rendered moot. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on June 28, 2021, by filing a complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF…