Williams v. Perry & Associates Attorneys At Law

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CLIFTON WILLIAMS, JR, Case No. 1:22-cv-00733-ADA-SKO

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE

v. A CLAIM

(Doc. 1)

PERRY & ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT 21-DAY DEADLINE LAW, et al., Defendants.

16 17 I. INTRODUCTION A. Background On June 16, 2022, Plaintiff Clifton Williams, Jr., (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an action. (Doc. 1 (“Compl.”).) On that same date, Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which was granted on June 22, 2022. (Docs. 2 & 3.) Plaintiff’s complaint is now before the Court for screening. The undersigned finds that Plaintiff has not stated a cognizable claim and will recommend that this action be dismissed, without leave to amend, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. B. Screening Requirement and Standard In cases where the…