Dorothy

(PS) Van Den Heuvel v. Dorothy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20222:21-cv-02176California3,838 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 2:21–cv–2176–TLN–CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FURTHER

AMEND

DOROTHY, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding without counsel in this action,1 was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on January 10, 2022. (ECF No. 4.) However, in screening the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the court found plaintiff’s complaint unsuitable for service and ordered plaintiff to file an amended complaint addressing the problems identified. (Id.) Since then, the court has granted plaintiff multiple extensions of time and responded to plaintiff’s various filings in an effort to facilitate his submission of an amended complaint that addresses the defects identified in the court’s January 10, 2022 screening order. (ECF Nos. 7, 9, 11, 14.) On August 15, 2022, plaintiff finally filed a document that clearly qualifies as a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.