(SS) Mansfield v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20222:20-cv-01540California4,795 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD LEE MANSFIELD, No. 2:20-cv-1540 DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,1 15 Defendant. 17 This social security action was submitted to the court without oral argument for ruling on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment.2 Plaintiff’s motion asserts several arguments including that the Administrative Law Judge erred at step two of the sequential evaluation, as well as with respect to the development of the record, treatment of the medical opinion evidence, and treatment of lay witness testimony. ////

25 1 After the filing of this action Kilolo Kijakazi was appointed Acting Commissioner of Social Security and has, therefore, been substituted as the defendant. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (referring to the “Commissioner’s Answer”); 20 C.F.R. § 422.210(d) (“the person holding the Office of the Commissioner shall, in his official capacity, be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.