Rayna

(PC) Rodriguez v. Rayna

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20221:19-cv-01788California1,191 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION 8 9 ERLINDO RODRIGUEZ, JR., 1:19-cv-01788-BAK (HBK) (PC) 10 Plaintiff, SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER— NOTICE AND WARNING OF v. REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING DEFENDANTS’ SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION

L. RAYNA, et al., (Doc. No. 51) Defendants.

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

16 17 Plaintiff Erlindo Rodriguez, Jr. is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case proceeds against Defendants J. Carranza-Rico and L. Reyna for a December 3, 2018, denial of food claim and against Defendant Reyna for a December 4, 2018 denial of food claim in violation of the Eighth Amendment. I. Rand Notice Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on August 8, 2022. (Doc. No. 51.) Defendants’ motion is not accompanied by a Rand warning. (Id.) Consequently, pursuant to Woods v. Carey,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.