Estate of Xander Mann v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20221:21-cv-01098California1,672 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ESTATE OF XANDER MANN, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01098-AWI-SKO

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS

v. TO COMPEL

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., (Docs. 45, 46) Defendants.

17 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Plaintiffs Estate of Xander Mann, Amy Pickering, and Justin Mann (collectively, “Plaintiffs”)’s motions to compel discovery from Defendant County of Stanislaus (the “County”), filed June 8, 2022. (Docs. 45, 46.) The parties filed their joint statements directed to the motions to compel, as required by this Court’s Local Rule 251, on June 22, 2022. (Docs. 47, 48.) The Court reviewed the parties’ papers and all supporting material and found the matter suitable for decision without oral argument. The hearing set for July 6, 2022, was therefore vacated. (Doc. 49.) Having considered the parties’ briefing, and for the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motions to compel will be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.