Sacramento Homeless Union v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20222:22-cv-01095California8,018 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO HOMELESS UNION, a No. 2:22-cv-01095-TLN-KJN local of the CALIFORNIA HOMELESS UNION/STATEWIDE ORGANIZING COUNCIL, on behalf of itself and those it represents; BETTY RIOS; DONTA ORDER WILLIAMS; FALISHA SCOTT and all those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, a political subdivision of the State of California; CITY OF SACRAMENTO, a municipal corporation; and DOES 1–100, 19 Defendants. 20 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Sacramento Homeless Union (the “Union”), Betty Rios (“Rios”), Donta Williams, and Falisha Scott’s (“Scott”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion to Extend or Reinstate the Preliminary Injunction and for Sanctions. (ECF No. 24.) Defendant City of Sacramento (the “City”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 28.) Plaintiffs have filed a reply. (ECF No. 32.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Extend or

Defendant County of Sacramento (the “County”) is also a named Defendant in this action, but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.