Roe

Zoom Imaging Solutions, Inc. v. Roe

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20222:19-cv-01544California9,023 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 ZOOM IMAGING SOLUTIONS, INC., No. 2:19-cv-01544 WBS KJN Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE:

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

EDWARD ROE; MAXWELL RAMSAY; JON PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT,

CROSSEN; CORINNE FUERST; ANDREW DEFENDANTS ROE AND POWER’S

ALSWEET, KEVIN TOON; JASON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT,

PEEBLER; ABIGAIL NEAL; POWER AND DEFENDANTS RAMSAY,

BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY LLC; BRYAN CROSSEN, PEEBLER, DAVIS, AND

DAVIS; MAURA LOPEZ; JEFFREY LOPEZ’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

ORLANDO; JESSICA HINTZ; and DOES JUDGMENT 1 through 100, inclusive, 19 Defendants.

21 ----oo0oo---- 22 Plaintiff Zoom Imaging Solutions, Inc. (“Zoom”) brings 23 this action against defendants Edward Roe, Maxwell Ramsay, Jon 24 Crossen, Jason Peebler, Bryan Davis, Maura Lopez, and Power 25 Business Technology LLC (“Power”),1 arising from defendants’

The parties previously stipulated to voluntary dismissal of defendants Andrew…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.