Contreas

(PC) Haynes v. Contreas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20221:22-cv-00536California679 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 RAYSHAWN HAYNES, Case No. 1:22-cv-00536-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT CERTAIN v. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED

F. CONTREAS, et al.,

(ECF Nos. 1 & 8) Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE Rayshawn Haynes (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which includes state law claims. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on May 4, 2022. (ECF No. 1). The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 8). The Court found that only the following claims should proceed past the screening stage: Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against defendants Cleveland, Luna, Cloud, Orozco, Chan, and Contreas and his Fourteenth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.