Gates

(PC) Ruiz v. Gates

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20222:19-cv-02518California398 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, No. 2:19-CV-2518-DAD-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS S. GATES, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ unopposed motion to revoke Plaintiff’s IFP status, see ECF No. 40. Defendants argue that Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status should be revoked and this action should be dismissed without prejudice to refiling upon pre-payment of the filing fees. See ECF No. 7. After Plaintiff failed to file an opposition within the time specified by the Local Rules, the Court issued a minute order on June 29, 2022, advising Plaintiff that failure to oppose the motion could be construed as consent to the relief requested. See ECF No. 44. The minute order provided an additional 30 days within which to file an opposition. See id. To date, Plaintiff has not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.