(PC)Maldonado

(PC)Maldonado v. Kebler

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20222:22-cv-00923California260 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLY RAY SHANEE MALDONADO, No. 2:22-cv-0923 TLN AC P Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. B. KEBLER, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed July 25, 2022, plaintiff was ordered to pay the filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in dismissal of this action. ECF No. 7. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to the order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings //// //// and Recommendations.” …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.