Bridgett
(PS) Gibbs v. Bridgett
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT A. GIBBS, No. 2:20-cv-01956-DAD-DMC (PS) No. 2:20-cv-01957-DAD-DMC (PS) Plaintiff, No. 2:20-cv-01961-DAD-DMC (PS) No. 2:22-cv-00299-DAD-DMC (PS) v.
JEFF JENS, et al.,
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
Defendants. RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
ACTIONS WITH PREJUDICE AS HECK-
BARRED
AND RELATED CASES (Doc. No. 35) 18 Plaintiff Robert A. Gibbs is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in the above- captioned civil actions filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. These actions have been related within the meaning of Eastern District of California Local Rule 123(a). (Doc. No. 34.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302. On June 8, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that all four related actions be dismissed with prejudice as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). …