Covello

(PC) Blackwell v. Covello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20222:20-cv-01755California1,348 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RODNEY KARL BLACKWELL, No. 2:20-cv-1755 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER PATRICK COVELLO, Warden, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants have failed to provide a safe prison environment in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 12, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. (ECF No. 31.) Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.1 /////

1 On April 11, 2022, plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time to file objections to the findings and recommendations. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.