Gomez
Gomez v. Boulevard and Company, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRES GOMEZ, No. 2:21-cv-2057 WBS DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER THE BOULEVARD AND COMPANY, INC., a California Corporation, dba The Kana Company, 16 Defendant.
18 On August 2, 2022, defendant filed a motion for default judgment and noticed the matter for hearing before the undersigned on September 9, 2022, pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(19). (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiff’s motion seeks default judgment on the amended complaint’s claims that the defendant violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act. (Id. at 2.) Having reviewed plaintiff’s briefing, the undersigned will deny the motion without prejudice to renewal.1 In this regard, a district court is “required sua sponte to examine jurisdictional issues such as standing.” Bernhardt v. Cnty. of Los Angeles, 279 F.3d 862, 868 (9th Cir. 2002); see also Fed. 27 1 Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) the undersigned finds the matter suitable for…