(SS) Riley v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 20221:21-cv-00420California384 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EMMA RILEY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00420-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS

v. SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR

FAILURE TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

FIVE DAY DEADLINE

Defendant.

16 On March 15, 2021, Plaintiff Emma Riley filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying an application for disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. (ECF No. 1.) On April 1, 2022, the Court lifted the stay of this action and ordered that an opening brief be filed within 45 days of the filing of the administrative record. (ECF No. 11.) On June 30, 2022, the Court granted a stipulated extension of the time to file the administrative record until July 21, 2022, and on July 21, 2022, the administrative record was filed. (ECF Nos. 13, 14.) Forty-five (45) days have passed and no opening brief was filed by September 6, 2022. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.