Barge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 XAVIER LUMAR J’WEIAL, No. 2:17-cv-1937 MCE AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

COUNTY OF AMADOR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 40. I. Procedural History This case proceeds on the second amended complaint. ECF No. 20. On screening, the court found that plaintiff had stated claims for relief against defendants Barge1 and Lindsey but failed to state any cognizable claims against defendant Rivera, who was later dismissed from this action. ECF Nos. 21, 26. After the close of discovery, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 40), which plaintiff opposes (ECF No 42). After defendants filed their reply, plaintiff filed an addendum to the opposition (ECF No. 46), which defendants have moved to

1 …