Devine

(PC) Singh v. Devine

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 20221:22-cv-00061California620 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAGHVENDRA SINGH, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-0061 JLT SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING THE v. ) ACTION ) SHUBHANGINI DEVINE, ) (Doc. 26) ) Defendant. ) ) )

Raghvendra Singh is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis and seeks to hold the defendant liable for violations of his civil rights and the Americans with Disabilities Act. (Doc. 23.) The assigned magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. 26 at 3-11.) Because Plaintiff was previously informed of the applicable standards and the pleading deficiencies were not cured by amendments, the magistrate judge determined that further amendment would be futile. (Id at 11.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. (Id. at 12.) On September…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.