Davidson
Davidson v. District Attorney of Bakersfield
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TREVON FOREMAN and LOTISHA Case No. 1:22-cv-00581-DAD-BAK (SKO)
DAVIDSON,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFF TREVON FOREMAN
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR HIS
v. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT
ORDER AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
13 DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF (Doc. 9) BAKERSFIELD, 21-DAY DEADLINE
Defendant.
16 _____________________________________/
18 Plaintiffs Trevon Foreman and Lotisha Davidson (“Plaintiffs”) are proceeding pro se in this action. Plaintiffs filed their complaint against Defendant District Attorney of Bakersfield on May 16, 2022. (Doc. 1.) On that same date, Plaintiff Foreman, a state prisoner, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) without prepayment of fees. (Doc. 2.) On May 20, 2022, the undersigned issued an order finding that Plaintiff Foreman failed to submit to the Court a certified copy of his trust fund account statement, providing him another IFP application form,…