Davidson

Davidson v. District Attorney of Bakersfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20221:22-cv-00581California865 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TREVON FOREMAN and LOTISHA Case No. 1:22-cv-00581-DAD-BAK (SKO)

DAVIDSON,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFF TREVON FOREMAN

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR HIS

v. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT

ORDER AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

13 DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF (Doc. 9) BAKERSFIELD, 21-DAY DEADLINE

Defendant.

16 _____________________________________/

18 Plaintiffs Trevon Foreman and Lotisha Davidson (“Plaintiffs”) are proceeding pro se in this action. Plaintiffs filed their complaint against Defendant District Attorney of Bakersfield on May 16, 2022. (Doc. 1.) On that same date, Plaintiff Foreman, a state prisoner, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) without prepayment of fees. (Doc. 2.) On May 20, 2022, the undersigned issued an order finding that Plaintiff Foreman failed to submit to the Court a certified copy of his trust fund account statement, providing him another IFP application form,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.