Munoz

(PC) Harris v. Munoz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20222:16-cv-00830California5,523 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GRADY HARRIS, No. 2:16-cv-0830 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

JEFF MACOMBER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants used excessive force, failed to protect him, and retaliated against him in violation of his constitutional rights. Presently before the court is defendant’s motion for an extension of time and his fully briefed motion1 for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant the motion for an extension of time and recommend that the motion be granted in part and denied in part as set forth below. ////

1 Defendants Calderon, Rose, Munoz, Fong, Williamson, Fuller, Cervantes, and Thompson are 26 represented by the Office of the Attorney General. Defendant Leavitt is separately represented and filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.