Munoz
(PC) Harris v. Munoz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GRADY HARRIS, No. 2:16-cv-0830 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
JEFF MACOMBER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants used excessive force, failed to protect him, and retaliated against him in violation of his constitutional rights. Presently before the court is defendant’s motion for an extension of time and his fully briefed motion1 for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant the motion for an extension of time and recommend that the motion be granted in part and denied in part as set forth below. ////
1 Defendants Calderon, Rose, Munoz, Fong, Williamson, Fuller, Cervantes, and Thompson are 26 represented by the Office of the Attorney General. Defendant Leavitt is separately represented and filed a…