(SS)(PS) Vis v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRISTOPHER VIS, Case No. 2:21-cv-00009-JDP (SS) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED
v. FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT
ORDERS
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ECF Nos. 10 & 11 15 Defendant.
17 On June 30, 2022, defendant filed a motion to dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state claim. ECF No. 11. Under the court’s scheduling order, plaintiff was required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendant’s motion by July 14, 2022. To date, he has responded to defendant’s motion. To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005);…