Kaur

(PS) Hernandez v. Kaur

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20222:22-cv-00181California1,387 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERARDO HERNANDEZ, 2:22-cv-0181-KJM-KJN PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER JASVIR KAUR d/b/a PARK-N-SAVE (ECF No. 15) LIQUOR, et al. 15 Defendants.

17 Before the court is defendant Jasvir Kaur’s motion for an extension of time to respond to plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. (ECF No. 15.) In January 2022, plaintiff filed this suit asserting structural violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and related laws at a store known as Park-N-Save Liquor, located at 3041 Rio Linda Boulevard in Sacramento, California. (ECF No. 1.) In March 2022, at plaintiff’s request, the Clerk of Court entered default against all defendants because they failed to respond to the complaint. (ECF Nos. 8, 9.) On June 6, 2022, plaintiff filed his currently pending motion for default judgment against all three remaining defendants—Jasvir Kaur, Dhiru Patel, and Kokila Patel—who are alleged to own and

Because at least defendant Kaur is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.