Arnold

(HC) Wallin-Reed v. Arnold

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 20222:17-cv-01495California13,518 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY CHAD WALLIN-REED, No. 2:17-cv-01495-TLN-CKD (HC) Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ERIC ARNOLD, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state inmate proceeding pro se with a federal habeas corpus application filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. Petitioner challenges his conviction following a jury trial in the Plumas County Superior Court for first degree murder, discharging a firearm at an occupied vehicle, five counts of assault with a firearm, and possession of an assault weapon. Petitioner was sentenced to 50 years to life plus a determinate term of 34 years. Respondent has filed an answer and petitioner has filed a traverse to the petition. ECF Nos. 26, 28. Therefore, the claims have been fully briefed by the parties. ECF Nos. 12, 22. Upon careful consideration of the record and the applicable law, the undersigned recommends denying petitioner’s habeas corpus application for the reasons set forth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.